By the way, I own those six books and would be happy to do look-ups for anyone interested.

In starting to study Stewart Baldwin's discourse, I ran across this comment....

"...we would like to know the exact point at which the genealogy becomes "correct" (whatever that word means in a context in which undetected adulteries are added to the obvious historical problems)."

That is the 800 lb gorilla in the room for all family historians. I am just now paying more attention to it, as DNA studies are providing us with some interesting statistics on the matter. Interesting, but even more, unsettling. The instances where the father of record is not the biological father runs to about 5% in modern Europeans and Americans. One in twenty? That is huge.